Lipid Matters

An exciting series of insights and discoveries in lipid science, brought to you by a diverse line-up of contributors! Dive into our blog for fresh takes on ground-breaking publications and thought-provoking items that push the boundaries of lipid research.

6th January 2026

The elusive origin of brain DHA, and the importance of publishing replication studies.

Supplementation with omega3 fatty acids derived from fish oil has been promoted as a neutraceutical approach towards maintaining health for at least 50 years now, driven in the early days by epidemiological data on diverse inflammatory conditions including cardiovascular disease and latterly, by studies on dementia risk. Of course, epidemiology does not prove cause and effect and in more recent times, several randomized clinical trials have conclusively failed to evidence the attractive idea that these lipids might be a panacea for any chronic diseases of ageing. One major question in this field relates to the bioavailability of omega3 fatty acids when orally administered. Dogma has been that dietary forms should be absorbed then taken up into cell membranes, particularly in the brain, where they’ll magically (through largely unknown but oft debated mechanisms) prevent cognitive decline. But does this idea hold up?

At the recent Society of Chemistry in Industry meeting in London on Lipids in Diet and Health, there was lively discussion of this exact question, initiated by a presentation from Richard Bazinet on his recent study in J Lipid Res (https://www.jlr.org/article/S0022-2275(25)00175-0/fulltext). This seminal paper discussed how the brain is unable to make its own DHA, so it relies on other sources to maintain the high levels required for normal brain function. Here, Klievik et al set out to re-evaluate a series of studies by Sugasini et al, where supplementation with either LPC-DHA or di-DHA-PC was claimed to increase brain DHA content by up to 2-3 fold in mice. This was prompted by a recent study showing in contrast, that LPC-DHA supplementation didn’t increase brain DHA levels in Apoe3 and Apoe4 knock-in mice, and because as the authors state, they “are not aware of any direct evidence supporting the intact absorption of sn-1 DHA into the plasma”. In summary, in the recent study from Bazinet and colleagues, while oral supplementation of DHA either as PC or LPC led to significant enrichment in plasma and heart lipid pools, brain DHA levels were completely unchanged. This agrees with more recent data on this question cited by Bazinet, supporting the notion that the brain self-regulates its DHA levels rather than being influenced solely by what happens in the diet.

The importance of this study is twofold. First, it’s essential to understand where the brain derives DHA from, and how this could be regulated therapeutically. This study shows that in mice this is not from diet, leaving endogenous synthesis as the source. Indeed, in his seminal lecture at the SCI meeting, Richard presented new data beyond the published study, using natural abundance carbon isotope ratio analysis to demonstrate that DHA in the brain originates from endogenous synthesis. An earlier JLR paper describing this method is here: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022227520300213.

The second reason that this paper is important is that it’s a replication study, performed in response to conflicting literature on the topic. Science depends on careful replication of key findings and all too often this doesn’t happen at all, or if it does, it occurs many years later having followed a long period of wasted time, funding and lost careers. Publication of negative data is difficult and hard work for all involved but it’s an essential part of science if we are to ensure the record is accurate. The field of omega3 fatty acids isn’t unique in facing this issue, nor are the issues addressed in this study by any means the only question marks hanging over fish oil neutraceutical claims. The editors of JLR should also be commended for supporting publication of replication studies, upholding standards in research through providing opportunities to correct and debate research respectfully through the process of peer review.

Valerie O'Donnell

Cardiff University

Archive

2026
2025
2024
2023

Go to older Lipid Matters posts Bill Christie's occasional series of notes on publications or other items dealing with lipid science. For the previous curated collection of comments from the world of lipid research please visit - Lipid Trends